Blog

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    Digya Shrestha and Jyoti Pokharel, Dhaka Community Managers

    Despite benefitting from an impressive increase in its domestic food grain production, Bangladesh has yet to achieve comprehensive food security. One out of every four households in Bangladesh suffers from food insecurity, and the poorest struggle to find enough safe and healthy food to sustain themselves. Increases in domestic food production, food imports, and the management of food all contribute to the availability of food at the national level. However, the availability of food does not eliminate all food insecurity: the purchasing power of the poor and the high price of food also limit access to food.

    The Association for Socio-Economic Advancement in Bangladesh (ASEAB) was established in 1993 and works for the development and empowerment of marginalized communities. One of its programs, “Slum and Urban Development Program,” focuses on nutrition and food security for slum dwellers, by helping them increase their income enough to afford basic nutrition. Since 2001, ASEAB has been providing services to 150 families living in Dhaka’s slums. The services include microcredit support, along with income-generating trainings like tailoring, block-boutique, and candle making. This services provide the urban poor with skills and opportunities to increase their income and to therefore sustain their basic demands for food.

    Despite ASEAB’s contribution to improving food security in Dhaka, this program alone is not sufficient to bring comprehensive food security. The government should also play a role— for instance, by regulating food prices and by maintaining the purchasing power of poor. Another way to prevent rising prices would be to increase the government’s food stock in the market so that if a shortage occurs, the government can deliver food to the market. This solution would also prevent the hike of food prices following a shortage of supply.

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    هدايا العيد: القاهرة

    Howaida Kamel, Cairo Community Manager

    أثارت جوانب مدينة القاهرة التاريخية، و المعمارية، والثقافية، و الاقتصادية، و السياسية عديد من المؤلفات والكتابات الأدبية المختلفة عن المدينة .و مع أخذ ذلك في الاعتبار، لدي ثلاث اقتراحات لكتب مميزة عن تاريخ القاهرة العريق, و لوجستيات و تعقيدات هذه المدينة.

    Cairo Contested: Governance, Urban Space and Global Modernity, edited by Diane Singerman
    (٢٠٠٩)

    قد يكن هذا الكتاب تتمة لكتاب الCairo Cosmopolitan (٢٠٠٦) و يتناول قضايا القوات السياسة، و السوقية، و الغير رسمية التي تتحكم بشكل جماعي في الدالات اليومية للمدينة في ضمن سياق العولمة النيوليبرالية. أقدر هذا الكتاب لأنه يتكلم بشكل واضح و صريح عن القوات التي كانت تتحكم في المدينة قبل الثورة، بما في ذلك نظام الدولة السلطوي السابق، الشبكات الاجتماعية غير الرسمية، و أخيراً الفجوة الصارخة بين النمو الاقتصادي الذي نتج عن حركة العولمة، وعدم تضمن هذه الحركة للفئات الشعبية الأكثر إحتياجاً لهذا النمو.

    Cairo: Histories of a City, by Nezar AlSayyad
    (٢٠١١)

    تناول تاريخ القاهرة في كتاب واحد مهمة عسيرة جداً ، لأن تاريخ المدينة يعود إلى زمن الفراعنة.و مع ذلك، يتتبع هذا الكتاب تاريخ القاهرة عن طريق اختيار قصص معينة و أماكن محددة تمثل العصور المختفلة التي مرت بها المدينة. و يشمل هذا النثر العديد من الرسومات، والصور، والخرائط التي تعبرعن الطبقات المختلفة المتداخلة في بيئة القاهرة العمرانية.

    Understanding Cairo: The Logic of a City Out of Control, by David Sims
    (٢٠١١)

    هذا الكتاب سهل نسبياً للقراءة، و فيه يحاول الكاتب أن يجيب على الأسئلة التي يتساءل الجميع عنها في ما يخص لوجستيات مدينة القاهرة. أوصي شخصياً بقراءة هذا الكتاب لأنه يلتقط ايجابيات و سلبيات المدينة التي تؤثر على سكان القاهرة و السائحين، مع التركيز على الاجراءات الحكومية و الغير رسمية، و حركة المرور، والعديد من الطبقات المتراكبة في البنية الاجتماعية للمدينة. بدلا من انتقاد عيوب المدينة، يقول سيمز أننا ينبغي علينا أن نقدر القاهرة و شعبها لبذل الكثير من الجهد لتخطي كل هذه المشاكل، و إستمرار الأعمال اليومية بالمدينة في ظل الظروف الصعبة.

    و من المهم أن تقوم الدولة بحفظ هذا العدد الكبير من الأدبيات في مكان واحد؛ فهناك فجوة للوصول إلى المكتبات العامة بالقاهرة، خاصة في مجالين التمدن و الهندسة المعمارية. يسعى مختبر عمران القاهرة للتصميم والدراسات (CLUSTER) لجمع كل الأعمال المرتبطة بالمدينة مثل الكتب، والأطروحات، و تقارير وكالات التنمية، والخرائط، و المشاريع الطلابية، و حفظ هذه الأعمال بطريقة منظمة في مكتبة عمران القاهرة الحديثة (CURL). والهدف من (CURL) هو توفير الموارد الأساسية اللازمة لمخططي المناطق الحضرية والمهندسين المعماريين. لا يزال المشروع في المرحلة التجريبية له، و لكنه سوف يكن متناول للاستعمال بشكل كامل لعامة الشعب بحلول عام ٢٠١٤. ترحب منظمة (CURL) بالمساهمات المتعلقة بالعمارة والعمران. إذا أردت أن تساهم في تعزيز الأدبيات المتعلقة بالمناطق الحضرية في القاهرة، يمكنك إرسال بريد إلكتروني مباشرة لمنظمة
    [email protected] :Cluster

    Howaida Kamel, Cairo Community Manager

    The historic, architectural, cultural, economic, and now political dimensions of Cairo have led to a plethora of literature of all genres to be written about the city. Here are just three book suggestions — works that attempt to decipher the logistics, complexities, confusion, history, and beauty that together are Cairo.

    Cairo Contested: Governance, Urban Space and Global Modernity, edited by Diane Singerman (2009): A sequel to the 2006 Cairo Cosmopolitan, this book addresses the many distinct political, informal, and market forces that collectively govern the daily functions of the city within the context of neo-liberal globalization. I appreciate this book because it rightly addresses the governing forces of the city prior to the revolution: the semi-authoritarian state regime; the informal social networks and systems that the majority of the population is subject to; and, lastly, the stark divide between economic growth from globalization and the isolation of this growth from those who need it the most.

    Cairo: Histories of a City by Nezar AlSayyad (2011): Describing the history of Cairo is a daunting task dating all the way back to the time of the Pharaohs. This book traces the history of the city by choosing a specific location, identity, and story that best represents each time period in the city’s past to describe the Cairo of that era. The prose creates a link to the many drawings, photographs, and maps that illustrate the many overlapping layers in Cairo’s built environment until the present day.

    Understanding Cairo: The Logic of a City Out of Control by David Sims (2011): This is a relatively easy read that attempts to answer the question everyone wants to ask about the city: how does Cairo function? I recommend this book because it captures the complex love-hate relationship that both visitors and Cairenes have with the city, focusing on informal processes, traffic, city government, and the many interwoven layers of the urban social fabric. Sims argues that rather than criticize all of the faults and missing pieces in the system, Cairo should be prized as a success story as it continues to operate in the face of all of these adversities.

    Because there is so much literature on Cairo, it is extremely important to collect all of these works together in one location. There is a gaping hole in access to public libraries, and especially to specialist libraries that focus on items related to Cairo’s urbanism and architecture. The Cairo Laboratory for Urban Studies, Training, and Environmental Research (CLUSTER) seeks to collect all Cairo-specific works such as books, dissertations, development agency reports, maps, and student projects in the new Cairo Urban Resource Library (CURL). The aim of CURL is to create the necessary resource infrastructure needed for urban planners and architects, to be cataloged in both English and Arabic. The project is still in its beta phase and is not yet open to the public, but aims to be fully operational in the beginning of 2014. CURL welcomes contributions, such as resources from publishers or individuals on architecture and urbanism. Should you wish to contribute to the enhancement of urbanist literature in Cairo, you can contact CLUSTER directly at [email protected].

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    The Asian University for Women Writing Team, Dhaka Community Managers

    Grameen Bank is one of the most successful experiments in extending credit to Bangladesh’s poor. Many have used microfinance to pull themselves out of poverty. The beginnings of Grameen Bank can be traced back to 1976, when Professor Muhammad Yunus, the head of the Rural Economics Program at the University of Chittagong, launched a research project to examine the possibility of designing a credit delivery system to provide banking services for the rural poor. This research project grew, and as of 2011, Grameen Bank’s 23,144 employees serve 8.349 million borrowers (97 percent of which are women) in 81,379 villages, covering more than 97 percent of the total villages in Bangladesh. Borrowers own 90 percent of the bank’s shares, while the remaining 10 percent is owned by the government.

    The Grameen Bank’s loan system is divided into several steps. The first step is to encourage the poor to believe that they can succeed as an entrepreneur. The poor attend a training program, and then draft a credit proposal. Only then do the beneficiaries receive the funds for investment. The rest of the process includes fund collection, returns, operations, and credit cost.

    Grameen’s methodology encourages borrowers to strive for specific goals in social, educational, and health sectors, known as the “sixteen decisions”. These include helping others in need, drinking clean water, and educating children. Grameen therefore does not limit itself to providing credit, but also works on other development goals.

    Grameen Bank’s work shows how transformative a small amount of money can be in breaking the cycle of poverty. Microfinance has shown to be one of the most effective means of “developing from below,” leading not only to increased income but also to empowerment.

    Photo credit: Schipul

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    লেখকঃ নিশা কারকি

    অনুবাদকঃ নুসরাত ইয়াসমিন এবং ফারজানা নওশিন

    বিশ্ব ব্যাংক এক জরিপে বলেছে যে, বাংলাদেশে দরিদ্র (মাথাপিছু আয়২ ডলার) মানুষের সংখ্যা ২৬ শতাংশ কমে গিয়েছে অর্থাৎ যা ২০০০ সালে ছিল ৬,৩০,০০০০০ সেটি ২০১০ সালে কমে ৪,৭০,০০০০০ হয়েছে। যদিও বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক উন্নতি প্রতি বছর ১% করে বাড়ছে তারপরও গরীব ও মধ্যবিত্তের মধ্যে অর্থনৈতিক বৈষম্য এখনো আছে। এই অর্থনৈতিক বৈষম্যতা মধ্যবিত্ত ও গরীবদের মধ্যে সরকার প্রদানকৃত যানবাহন ব্যবস্থার উপর প্রভাব বিস্তার করে। জনাব মান্নান এর মতে, ঢাকার যানবাহন পরিস্থিতি উচ্চ আয়ের পরিবারের জন্য বেশী প্রযোজ্য এবং সুবিধাজনক। ঢাকায় যেসব পরিবারের নিজস্ব মোটরযান আছে তাদের ৬৬% মানুষেরই আয় ৩০,০০০ টাকার বেশী। অন্যদিকে, নিম্ন আয়ের জনগোষ্ঠীর মোটরবিহীন গণপরিবহন ব্যবহার করার প্রবনতা বেশী। এ কারণে এ সমস্ত যানবাহনে অতিরিক্ত ভীড় থাকে; বিশেষ করে মহিলা এবং শিশুদের জন্য এসব যানবাহন ব্যবহার করা অস্বস্তিকর করে পড়ে। সি.এন.জি, নিজস্ব গাড়ী এবং বাস অতিরিক্ত ব্যবহারের কারণে শহুরে জনগোষ্ঠী গণপরিবহনের মান কমিয়ে দিয়েছে; উপরন্তু, রিকশা এবং বাইসাইকেলেরও মান কমে গিয়েছে।

    ১৯৬১ অধ্যাদেশে সপ্তম নম্বরের অধীনে বাংলাদেশ রোড ট্রান্সপোর্ট কর্পোরেশন (বি.আর.টি.সি) প্রতিষ্ঠিত হয়েছিল। এটি বাংলাদেশ সরকারের স্বীকৃত পরিবহন কর্পোরেশন যা সকল শ্রেণীর মানুষের জন্য সস্তা এবং আরামদায়ক ভ্রমন ব্যবস্থা প্রদানের জন্য প্রতিষ্ঠিত হয়। বর্তমানে বাংলাদেশে বি.আর.টি.সি এর ১,১১৬ টি বাস পুরো বাংলাদেশে চলাচল করছে কিন্তু এগুলো ৪৭ মিলিয়ন (প্রায় ২৬ শতাংশ) দরিদ্র মানুষের পরিবহন চাহিদা মিটাতে যথেষ্ট নয়।

    অনুরূপভাবে, কার্যকরী, সাশ্রয়ী মূল্যে পরিবহন ব্যবস্থা প্রদানের লক্ষ্যে বাংলাদেশ সরকার বিশ্ব ব্যাংকের সহায়তায় ঢাকা নগর পরিবহন প্রকল্প (DUTP) প্রতিষ্ঠিত করেছে। খন্দকার ও রাউসের মতে, ডি.ইউ.টি.পি. ফ্লাইওভার নির্মাণের মাধ্যমে প্রধান সড়কে যানবাহন চলাচলের উন্নতিসাধন করেছে; যদিও বাস্তবে এর দ্বারা পুরুষ যাত্রীগণ, উচ্চবিত্ত মানুষ এবং মোটরগাড়ী-মালিকবৃন্দ প্রধানত উপকৃত হচ্ছে। বস্তুত, নিম্ন আয়ের মানুষ, যাদের যানবাহন ছিল পরিবহন সাশ্রয়ী রিকশা, তাদের ফ্লাইওভার নির্মাণকালীন সময়ে কষ্টভোগ করতে হয়েছিল। ক্ষুদ্র পুঁজিবাদীদের উপর এই প্রকল্পের পর্যাপ্ত বিচার-বিশ্লেষণের অভাবের ফলে দরিদ্র জীবনে ব্যাপক ক্ষতিসাধন হয়েছে।

    দরিদ্র এবং মধ্যবিত্ত শ্রেণীর মধ্যে পরিবহন পরিকাঠামোগত ফাঁক কমানোর জন্য বাংলাদেশ সরকারকে গণপরিবহন, যেমন-রেলওয়ে বা স্বল্প দামী পাবলিক বাসের সংখ্যা বৃদ্ধি করতে হবে। সকল প্রকার পরিবহনের সেবা চার্জ যেন সব শ্রেণীর জন্য সহজলভ্য হয় সেদিকে নজর রাখতে হবে। এক বিবৃতিতে ওয়ার্ল্ড ব্যাংক বলে, “পরিবহন বিধি যা মোটরবিহীন-চালিত যানবাহন ব্যবহারের প্রচার চালায় তা সাধারণত সেই জনগোষ্ঠীর সরাসরি কল্যাণ সাধন করে যারা মোটরচালিত যানবাহন ব্যবহারে সামর্থ্য নয়।” তাই সরকারের মোটরবিহীন-চালিত যানবাহন ব্যবহারের প্রতি বিশেষ দৃষ্টি রাখতে হবে। উদাহরণস্বরূপ, রিকশা এবং বাইসাইকেলের উপর থেকে কর সরিয়ে ফেলা বা হ্রাস করা এবং পারকিং এর জন্য খালি স্থান তৈরী করতে হবে। ভবিষ্যতে পরিবহন প্রকল্প গঠনের সময় যেমনঃ ডি.ইউ.টি.পি.(DUTP), দরিদ্রদের উপর নেতিবাচক এবং ইতিবাচক প্রভাব কীরূপ পড়ছে তা পরিকল্পনাকারীকে ও সরকারকে অবশ্যই খেয়াল রাখতে হবে। উন্নয়ন প্রকল্পগুলোর ধনীদের উপকার করার পাশাপাশি সরাসরি দরিদ্রদের জীবনযাত্রার মান উন্নয়ন করা উচিত।

    Photo credit: Robert Monestel

    Nisha Karki, Dhaka Community Manager

    The World Bank has stated that the number of Bangladeshis living in poverty, with a per capita income of less than $2 a day, has declined from 63 million in 2000 to 47 million (26 percent of the overall Bangladeshi population) in 2010. Though Bangladesh has successfully upgraded its economic growth rate every decade by one percent, there is still a huge economic gap between the poor and the middle class. This economic gap causes inequality regarding the transportation facilities provided to the rich and to the poor. According to Md. Shafiqul Mannan, the Dhaka transportation system favors high-income households. Sixty-six percent of the households with private motor vehicles belong to the income group higher than 30,000 BDT. In contrast, low-income groups have a higher tendency to choose non-motorized vehicles (rickshaws and bicycles). Public transportation is usually uncomfortable, crowded, overloaded, and difficult to access for poor women and children. The middle-class use of compressed natural gas-powered auto-rickshaws, private cars and buses has led to a decrease in service and quality of public transportation and non-motorized vehicles, such as rickshaws and bicycles.

    Under the ordinance No. VII of 1961, the Bangladesh Road Transport Corporation (BRTC) was established as a government corporate transport body to provide cheap and comfortable travel for all groups of people. Currently, there are 1,116 BRTC buses running all over Bangladesh, but this number is not sufficient to provide the desired services for the 47 million poor people who live in Bangladesh.

    In order to create efficient, affordable, and sustainable transport, the Bangladesh government, in collaboration with the World Bank, established the Dhaka Urban Transport Project (DUTP). According to Khandoker and Rouse, the DUTP has brought improvements in the flow of traffic along main roads by constructing flyovers. However, the benefits were felt mainly by private bus users and car owners, not the poor. Indeed, lower-income people were excluded since non-motorized vehicles such as rickshaws were banned during the construction period. Lack of careful examination and analysis of the impact of this project on poor stakeholders caused negative impacts on the lives of the poor.

    To minimize gaps between the transportation infrastructure for the poor and the middle class, the Bangladesh government needs to increase the number of public transportation options that are less expensive, such as railways or public buses. Ticket prices for all kinds of transportation should be monitored to ensure that they are affordable for all. As the World Bank stated, “Transport interventions that promote the use of non-motorized transport usually contribute directly to the welfare of those people who cannot afford motorized transport.” Therefore, the government needs to provide special attention to the uses and benefits of non-motorized vehicles. For example, taxes on rickshaws and bicycles should be removed or reduced, and free lanes should be created for parking non-motorized vehicles. When designing transportation projects such as DUTP, planners and the government must take into account the effects that these projects will have on the poor.

    Photo credit: Robert Monestel

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    رصد المبادرات العمرانية بالقاهرة

    Mohamed Adel, Cairo Community Manager

    منصة المبادرات العمرانية بالقاهرة، موقع أطلقه مختبر عمران القاهرة للتصميم والدراسات “كِلَسّتَر” مؤخراً باللغتين العربية والإنجليزية، “تضم المنصة مبادرات متعددة في الهندسة المعماريّة والفنون والتنمية العمرانيّة والمبادرات الحقوقية وتلك متعددة التخصصات التي تتناول موضوعات تتعلّق بالمدينة والبيئة العمرانيّة والمساحات العامّة في القاهرة.” عبر استخدام خريطة تفاعلية تتيح للمستخدمين إضافة مبادرات جديدة كنوع من الخرائط التعاونية.

    تعود بداية الخرائط التعاونية في مصر على الأرجح مع انطلاق خريطة التحرش الجنسي في ديسمبر/ كانون الأول 2010، وتهدف الخريطة المبنية على منصة يوشاهيدي المجانية والمفتوحة المصدر إلى رصد التحرش الجنسي في مصر من خلال تقارير تُرسل عبر الموقع الإلكتروني للخريطة أو عبر رسائل المحمول النصية. تؤمن المبادرة بإمكانية “…أن تساعد كثيرا في دعم العمل وجها لوجه مع المجتمع لتعبئة الجمهور للتحدث ضد التحرش الجنسي.” في العام الماضي حصلت المبادرة على لقب أفضل استخدام للتكنولوجيا للمصلحة العامة من جوائز أفضل المدونات (بوبز) من مؤسسة دويتشه فيله.

    تبعت عدة مبادرات خريطة التحرش الجنسي معتمدين على منصة يوشاهيدي لأغراض مختلفة تعددت من رصد أماكن تظاهرات ثورة 25 يناير أو رصد أماكن انقطاع الكهرباء وحتى رصد الجرائم وأعمال الفساد والرشاوي. انتشرت الخرائط التعاونية ليس فقط في مصر بل في مختلف البلدان العربية أيضاً.

    تعد منصة المبادرات العمرانية بالقاهرة تجربة فريدة جداً حيث تتيح المنصة لأي شخص يستطيع الوصول للإنترنت رصد، تعديل أو مجرد إضافة بيانات المبادرات دون توقيعها على الخريطة حيث كثير من المبادرات لا مكان لها على الاطلاق (تنشر المعلومات والبيانات بعد مراجعتها). بالإضافة إلى دليل إلكتروني، شيء أشبه بدليل يلوبيدجز الشهير؛ لكن أكثر إنفتاحاً للمجتمع بالإضافة إلى تقويم أو أجندة برامج وفعليات، وهو أمر كانت لفترة طويلة تقوم به بعض المدونات أو المواقع، وتم بناء هذا الدليل نتيجة تفاعل بين المبادرات والمنظمات والأفراد العاملين في المساحات العامة.

    أقامت كلستر لقاءات سابقة لإطلاق الموقع مع الأفراد والمنظمات. جمع اللقاء الأول بين المؤسسات والمنظمات المعنية في القاهرة لعدة جلسات للتوصل إلى الفرص والتحديات المحتملة التي تواجه المبادرات العمرانية وتمت دعوة الحضور للمشاركة في إعداد دليل منصة المبادرات العمرانية.

    جمع اللقاء الثاني المعماريين والفنانين المرتبطين بشكل مباشر بالمساحات والفراغات العامة للحديث حول القوانين واللوائح التي تحكم الممارسات في المساحات العامة وحقوق المجتمع، كذلك قضايا الفعليات الثقافية في المساحات أو الساحات العامة والتعاون بين الفنانين والمعماريين في هذا الشأن.

    تم إطلاق النسخة التجريبية للموقع يوم 30 من مارس/ آذار، 2013. الموقع متميز، جذاب ولافت للإنتباه بألوان متعددة تمثل مختلف أنواع المبادرات التي تتضمن أكاديمية/ بحثية، المطورون العقاريون، الفن/ الثقافة، مبادرات حقوقية، مدونات/ إعلام، الهندسة المعمارية/ العمران، هيئات حكومية، وكالات دولية، مساحات عامة؛ يمكن للمستخدمين ترتيب المبادرات بواسطة الإسم، مجال التخصص، الأنشطة، أو الموارد.

    تتضمن التصنيفات أيضاً تنمية المجتمع، الأفلام، التراث، حق السكن، الأدب، الموسيقى، التواصل، الفنون الحركية، التصوير، الحيز العام، الاستدامة، التكنولوجيا، والفنون الحركية.

    في مراجعة مُبكرة للخريطة وموقع المنصة نُشرت في 15 من مايو/أيار 2013، علق محمد الشاهد: “على الرغم من كون الألوان المختلفة لتوقيع المبادرات جذابة للوهلة الأولى إلا أنها لا توضح على الفور الاختلاف في الوظائف”.

    يضيف: “ربما من المفيد إضافة تصنيف بلون آخر للمتاحف الرسمية والأماكن والساحات الثقافية الأخرى التي تديرها الدولة بعضها خالية وقد تستخدمها المبادرات المستقلة لإجراء فعليات وبرامج. تؤكد الخريطة الحالية لمنصة المبادرات العمرانية بالقاهرة على حجب هذه الإمكانيات الخفية عبر تسليط الضوء فقط على الأماكن الفنية والثقافية المستقلة النشطة والفعالة.”

    بمجرد زيارة الموقع الآن، يظهر لنا على الفور مفتاح للألوان الموجودة على الخريطة لتوضيح دلالات هذه الألوان ووظائف كل منها.

    تتيح المنصة للمبادرات والمنظمات إدارة ومتابعة البيانات الخاصة بهم ونشر الفعليات عبر حسابات مُفعلة للمستخدمين، كما يوجد على الموقع دليل خطوة بخطوة لاستخدام نظام إدارة المحتوى الخاص بالمنصة لتحميل المعلومات.

    بدعم من مؤسسة فورد والمجلس الثقافي البريطاني، رغم حداثتها وكونها في طورها الأول تعتبر منصة المبادرات العمرانية بالقاهرة قاعدة بيانات فريدة من نوعها تصنف المبادرات والمنظمات وتقدمها للمهتمين خاصة المهتمين بمجال العمران والمساحات العامة في القاهرة بالإضافة إلى أجندة فعليات يتم تحديثها لمتابعة ماذا يحدث وأين يحدث. يستحق هذا المشروع المُبشر مزيد من الانتباه والدعم حتى يصبح أكثر إنفتاحاً للعامة ويكون أداة رائدة للمنفعة والمصلحة العامة.

    Mohamed Adel, Cairo Community Manager

    The Cairo Urban Initiatives Platform (CUIP) is a newly-launched bilingual Arabic/English online platform produced by the Cairo Lab for Urban Studies, Training and Environmental Research (CLUSTER). It “includes the multiple architecture, art, advocacy, urban development, and interdisciplinary initiatives addressing issues related to the city, the urban environment and public space in Cairo,” and uses an interactive map that allows users to list new initiatives in a crowdmapping project.

    Crowdmapping in Egypt started in December 2010 with the launch of Harassmap, which maps sexual harassment in Egypt through reports sent via website and text messages, based on the free and open-source Ushahidi platform. This initiative “… help[s] support face-to-face community action to mobilize the public to speak up against sexual harassment.” Last year, Harrasmap was awarded Best Use of Technology for Social Good from Deutsche Welle’s The Bobs (Best of Online Activism).

    Other mapping initiatives were created following Harassmap, and are based on the Ushahidi platform, with purposes ranging from mapping the January 25th protests to Egypt Blackouts to crime and corruption. These initiatives are not only based in Egypt, but in the entire Arab World.

    CUIP is a unique experiment as anyone with Internet access can map, edit, or add initiatives (information is published upon review). The platform even incorporates projects without a precise location. CUIP offers an online directory, somewhat similar to the well-known YellowPages, but more open to community. It includes a calendar of events (which for a long time only existed on some blogs and websites) based on further interaction between initiatives, organizations, and individuals that work with public space.

    Prior to the launch of the website, Cluster held meetings with individuals and organizations. Their first program brought stakeholders in Cairo together for multiple sessions in order to come up with the probable opportunities and challenges facing urban initiatives, and ended with an invitation to participants to create CUIP’s directory.

    The second program brought architects and artists in direct engagement with public space to address the involved laws and regulations governing practice in public space and community rights, issues of cultural events in public space, and collaboration between artists and architects in public space.

    Beta launch took place on March 30, 2013. The website was designed to be interesting and catchy, with different colors for each type of initiative, including academia/research, real estate developers, art/culture, advocacy, discursive media, architecture/urbanism, governmental institutions, international agencies and public spaces. Users can also sort initiatives by name, focus, activity, or resource. Categories also include crafts, cultural development, film, heritage, literature, music, networking, performing arts, photography, public space, sustainability, technology, and visual arts.

    In an early review of the program published on 15 May 2013, Mohamed Elshahed commented: “The color coding system while attractive at first impression doesn’t immediately translate into a clear distinction of theme or function”.

    He adds: “It would be useful to include perhaps another color-coded category for official museums and other state-managed cultural spaces some of which sit empty and could potentially be used for events and programs by independent initiatives. The current map perpetuates the invisibility of this latent potential by only highlighting the active and energetic independent arts and culture scene.”

    Visiting the platform now, one can see that the color legend appears immediately to notify the user about the color coding system.

    CUIP allows initiatives and organizations to manage and maintain their own data and to post events through confirmed user accounts. There is a step-by-step guide for using the platform content management system to upload information.

    Supported by the Ford Foundation and the British Council, CUIP is in its early phase but is already considered a unique and robust database, listing initiatives and organizations for anyone who deals with urbanism and public spaces in Cairo, and with an updated events calendar. This project has big potential and deserves to receive more attention and support in order to become more open to the public and to be a pioneering tool for social good.

    Photo credit: CUIP

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    Howaida Kamel, Cairo Community Manager

    One of the biggest problems faced by those living in poverty in Egypt is illiteracy. Government figures estimate that there are 17 million Egyptians who cannot read and write, the majority of whom are females concentrated in Upper Egypt and the Greater Cairo Region (GCR). In late 2011, the Vodafone Egypt Foundation partnered with the Life Makers Association and UNESCO under a joint campaign titled “Knowledge is Power.” The campaign aims to eliminate illiteracy in Egypt by 2017 by providing classes that teach basic reading, writing, and arithmetic skills in nine different governorates.

    The “Knowledge is Power” campaign is a unique model in that it effectively uses the different capacities of corporate actors, civil society organizations, international institutions, as well as public institutions and various other non-governmental and community-based organizations in order to achieve development goals. The Vodafone Foundation has pledged to finance the campaign for five years. The Life Makers Association facilitates the implementation on the ground and provides training for volunteers in the associated NGOs and CBOs. UNESCO has contributed with the curriculum development and the advanced syllabi, which also includes new technologies such as Java, Android, and iOS. The campaign is approved by the National Authority for Literacy and Adult Education and the Ministry of Education, and the public support assists the campaign in achieving its goals. Last but not least, there are 20 associated NGOs and CBOs in the nine governorates that provide the classes and reach out to illiterate people in their respective communities.

    The coordinated efforts of all these institutions is a crucial factor in the upscaling of the literacy classes in order to reach out to the 17 million target individuals. Annual targets were set for the number of volunteers recruited and projected outreach; below is a table of the annual targets for the first three years of the campaign.

    The project hopes to achieve exponential growth each year so that as the number of volunteers increases, the number of people educated will increase as well. The campaign has made astonishing progress, successfully training 8,000 volunteers and enlisting a total of 30,000 volunteers. The surplus in volunteers is indicative of the amount of support the literacy campaign has from the community of development practitioners in Cairo and throughout Egypt.

    As of late Spring 2013, the “Knowledge is Power” classes have registered 127,315 illiterate people, of whom 92,416 have passed the program’s primary literacy exam designed by the Life Makers Association. While these numbers don’t necessarily match up to the target numbers, there is an extremely high success rate of those who continue to the end of the program to pass the exam. However, only about one-third of those who complete the program have successfully passed the official Ministry of Education’s literacy exam.

    In the transition period that Egypt is currently facing, it is important that corporate actors and other institutions take initiatives towards national development goals. The government is no longer capable of being solely responsible. The Vodafone Egypt Foundation views illiteracy as one of the major problems in Egyptian society, especially in the context of the country’s transformation towards democracy. Vodafone Egypt CEO, Hatem Dawidar, summed it up quite well: “Through literacy we are accomplishing two things, development and democracy.”

    Photo credit: Vodafone Egypt Foundation

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    “All I remember is hands all over my body, grabbing under the layers of pullovers I was wearing, touching my breasts, opening my bra. More hands on my back and legs, my pants being pulled down. I tried to see the end of circle of men, but saw rows of men surrounding me, all pushing towards me. One man moved towards me in the middle of maybe forty men. When I could reach his hand, I just hugged the stranger and told him to help me. We moved further into the square and the man started moving faster. At that point I was not sure anymore whether he would help me or whether he was collaborating with the rest of the men. I panicked. I looked for other people to help. I saw a guy wearing one of the Operation Anti Sexual Harassment t-shirts and I started shouting louder. Luckily he saw me and made his way towards me. He grabbed me and held me and told me he would help me. I fell, the guy helped me up and I got up and was surrounded by women and men of the Anti Harassment group.” Read more or join the discussion.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Mon, 08/12/2013 – 00:00

    “كل ال ان فكراه إن كان فيه أيادي مسكاني من كل حتة في جسمي، أيادي بتحاول تفك حمالة صدري و بتفعص صدري من تحت البلوفر ال أنا كنت ارتديه. بقية الأيادي كانت مسكاني من ظهري و رجليا، و حسيت ببنطلوني بيتشد لتحت. حاولت أنظر حوالية عشان أشوف دائرة الرجال دي بتنتهي فين، لكن وجدت صفوف من الرجل محيطة بي، وكلهم بيزقو تجاهي.”

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Mon, 08/12/2013 – 00:00

    في يوم ٢٢ يونيو من هذا العام تحدثت مع الدكتورة سحر عطية، الرئيسة الجديدة لقسم الهندسة المعمارية في كلية الهندسة بجامعة القاهرة. قدمت الدكتورة سحر نظرة ثاقبة لقضايا التخطيط الحضري في القاهرة الكبرى و الأساليب التي يتم استخدامها لتوفير الخدمات لسكان هذه المنطقة.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Mon, 07/22/2013 – 00:00

    On June 22, I spoke with Dr. Sahar Attia, the new Chair of the Department of Architecture at the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. Dr. Sahar provided insight into issues of urban planning in Greater Cairo Region (GCR) and the methods used to provide services to Cairenes. Read more or join the discussion.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Mon, 07/22/2013 – 00:00

    I managed to drive across Kasr el Nile bridge at 8:30am to find people already on the streets, cleaning up after four days of protests. I passed the Constitutional Court, where police forces had secured the area so that Judge Adly Mansour, the new interim President, could take his oath. What became publicized rather quickly was the coincidence that Judge Mansour was appointed the Head of the Constitutional Court on June 30, after his predecessor’s term had ended. While some suspect that this might be foul play, he has served on the Constitutional Court since 1992 and has held the position of Vice-President until appointed as the leader by former President Mohamed Morsi. Read more.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Thu, 07/04/2013 – 09:57

    The entire country waited in apprehension for the 48-hour ultimatum to end. Local media had placed a countdown timer on the screen while showing the live feed of Tahrir, Itahedaya, and other major squares around the country. Large numbers of protesters started taking the streets around 3:30pm, waiting for the 4:30pm mark. With the Muslim Brotherhood supporters occupying the square at Cairo University, I stayed in the suburb of Maadi rather than go to Tahrir, especially considering the rumors that they had stopped traffic on all major bridges. Read more.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Thu, 07/04/2013 – 09:50

    In the early afternoon, the army released the aerial footage that they captured above Itahadeya and Tahrir on June 30. This was a political move used to show the huge amount of people that had came out against Morsi, and to show that the army is dedicated to following the will of the people. Read more.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Wed, 07/03/2013 – 15:47

    We woke up the next morning to find that those in Moqattam had stormed the Muslim Brotherhood headquarters to find rooms filled with Molotov cocktails and other types of weapons. Six were killed in the struggle. Read more.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Wed, 07/03/2013 – 13:57

    The protests against President Mohamed Morsi started on June 30th: Egyptians all over the country took to the streets to mark the one-year anniversary of the Muslim Brotherhood in power. The Tamarud “rebellion” campaign has been working for the past three months to collect signatures for their petition calling for the President’s immediate resignation; the group recently announced that it had collected 22,134,465 signatures. Media estimates claim that up to 33 million people stood in squares all over the country, in what BBC has titled the largest number of people to partake in a political protest ever. Read more.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Wed, 07/03/2013 – 10:18

    On July 13, 2010, approximately 15 buildings in the areas of Establ Antar and Ezbet Khairallah were demolished. As written in the 2011 Amnesty International report, families in these buildings were forced to remove their personal possessions and pay 200 LE (approximately $36 USD) for truck to take their belongings to alternative housing units in 6th of October City. Once the demolition began, security forces at the scene began to offload the belongings of 21 families, claiming that they were trying to cheat the enumeration process for free housing and they weren’t residents of the area. These families were then told that by paying 5000 LE ($890 USD) to a middle-man, they could be placed on the enumeration list. Read more or join the discussion.

    Submitted by Howaida Kamel — Mon, 07/01/2013 – 00:00

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    In cities around the world, the question of who does urban planning, and how, is central to the creation of just cities. This week’s conversation focuses on how to design city planning instruments to be more inclusive. Examples include government programs, participatory development schemes, biometric databases, and promising newly-elected officials. Read on to learn more about urban planning in Mumbai, Nairobi, Rio de Janeiro, Jakarta, Dhaka, and Mexico City, and then join the discussion below.

    Carlin Carr, Mumbai Community Manager

    Urban India can boggle the mind of even the most seasoned planners. The country’s economic growth has put metropolitan areas at the center of aspirations, causing widespread migration from rural villages and towns. With little urban planning on which to base the massive population growth, Mumbai has mushroomed chaotically. Transport, housing, water, sanitation, healthcare, and education fall short of residents’ most basic needs. Few master plans have moved from theory to action. And frustrated citizens have grown increasingly wary of political inaction. Yet one government program, the country’s ambitious Aadhaar initiative — which aims to provide every citizen with a unique identification number — has the potential to return planning to foundational basics on which to base equitable urban development.

    India is giving its citizens unique identification numbers at a daily rate equal to the size of small countries. Daily, nearly 40,000 new registrants hand over biometric data to government database registration centers. The undertaking, says The New York Times, will be “the world’s largest biometric database, a mind-bogglingly complex collection of 1.2 billion identities.” The Aadhaar program hopes to improve access to the country’s public distribution system and eliminate corruption by giving millions of poor people a simple but, until now, elusive official identity.

    The unique identity will not only help understand better who lives in urban areas, but also provides a channel through which the government can distribute welfare programs and link people to formal banking channels. In fact, Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation Minister Ajay Maken even believes that the Aadhaar number can aid in making urban planning more participatory. Following a workshop on the new national urban poverty alleviation program, Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY), Maken said that it will be made mandatory that the impacted communities must be part of the planning and implementation of projects under the scheme. In order to monitor this, he says that Aadhaar cards and biometric data will be key.

    While urban planning in India is often discussed in terms of large-scale mega-projects, the Aadhaar initiative challenges the very ground on which the programs are built. How can inclusive rhetoric be used if individual citizens lack such basics as identities? These identities are not just existentialist frameworks; rather, the unique numbers granted to each citizen gives the government a clearer picture of who lives here and what the needs are. It is also a mechanism, a new tool, for including all urban citizens in programs and projects that stand to benefit them. With that, more inclusive urban planning and implementation can help to tackle urban India’s mounting issues, bringing into focus how to move forward most effectively with all citizens in mind.

    Katy Fentress, Nairobi Community Manager

    Dr Evans Kidero, winner of the newly created Gubernatorial seat of Nairobi County, has promised to tackle head-on the majority of the city’s planning, infrastructure, and security problems.

    Speaking during his inaugural address on the 27th of March this year, Dr Kidero unveiled a seven-point plan with which he intends to bring Nairobi to the status of a World Class African metropolis. The speech highlighted a desire to address the desperate solid waste management situation the city is currently faced with; following that, Dr Kidero promised to focus on infrastructure development, public transport, and replacing informal settlements with low-cost housing.

    Dr Kidero’s has pledged to thoroughly re-examine the Nairobi Metro 2030 strategy, in order to ensure that Nairobi “residents enjoy a better life arising from better management of their city’s resources”.

    In his quest to upgrade the city, however, the ex-pharmacist and corporate manager is faced with an uphill struggle: Business Daily reports that the governor is inheriting $470,000 in debts from the previous city council, a number that he hopes to reduce through negotiations with the central government.

    Dr Kidero has drawn up a budget of $370,000 which will be spent on providing services to residents. Of this total budget, around $175,000 will be raised from internal sources within the county, while the National Treasury should provide the remaining amount.

    In order to achieve his objectives and ensure that the Nairobi Metro 2030 strategy remains on track, Dr Kidero has urged Nairobians to think creatively about what options they have. He has encouraged planners to think out of the box with regards to improving housing and living conditions.

    With respect to informal settlements, Dr Kidero believes their transformation to low-cost housing neighbourhoods will be achieved by putting enabling housing strategies in place through appropriate public-private partnerships; encouraging low-income households to save and invest for the incremental development of their housing; and establishing administrative procedures for the provision of less costly housing to the poor.

    Yet the question remains how Kidero will be able to reach many of the goals with a bankrupt city council. According to the online news outlet Jambonews, so far he has won widespread support (and made enemies) attempting to limit financial waste by firing 11 people for “delivering fictitious invoices for nonexistent goods” and suspending 16 members of his staff on suspicion of corruption.

    Dr Kidero, credited with reversing the fortunes of the Mumias Sugar Company while presiding over it as managing director, has a reputation for getting the job done and cutting back on inefficient practices.

    So will he be the man who finally manages to eliminate corruption from all levels of Nairobi’s city planning infrastructure? And will eliminating corruption make up for the backlog of debts the city is faced with?

    A lot hinges on the success of devolution, one of the main tenets of the 2010 constitution and a process that was fully put into motion once the elections were completed last month. The post of a County Governor directly elected by registered voters is an entirely new one and as a result Dr Kidero is treading unknown waters. He is the first to test whether the decentralisation of State organs will truly ensure that national and local resources are shared out equitably.

    Between the constitution, the Nairobi 2030 strategy and Dr Kidero’s successful past as a manager and not as a career politician, there is a chance that the objective of transforming Nairobi into a more productive and better functioning city, that can be increasingly enjoyed by all its citizens and not just a small percentage of them, could one day become a reality. Time will tell.

    Catalina Gomez, Rio de Janeiro Community Manager

    Planejar o desenvolvimento urbano das cidades no médio e longo prazo é um grande desafio. Para compreender melhor o processo de planejamento urbano no Rio de Janeiro, é importante descrever o marco do planejamento no Brasil para logo compreender melhor sua implementação ao nível da cidade.

    O planejamento das cidades Brasileiras é uma responsabilidade municipal. O Estatuto das Cidades é o nome da lei que guia o desenvolvimento urbano e o planejamento no país. O Estatuto foi aprovado em 2001 e entre outros requerimentos, estabelece que cidades com mais de 20 mil residentes desenvolvam um Plano Diretor, como o principal instrumento para guiar seu desenvolvimento urbano. Este plano deve ser atualizado a cada 10 anos. Adicionalmente, o Estatuto estabelece que as cidades com mais de 500 mil habitantes deverão desenvolver planos de transporte integrado compatíveis com o Plano Diretor.

    Atualmente, a grande maioria das cidades tem desenvolvido e aprovado seus planos, mais ainda presentam desafios para assegurar sua qualidade, especialmente os municípios com maiores debilidades institucionais. Outro desafio enfrentado por um grande número de cidades é assegurar um processo adequado de consulta com a sociedade civil para que sua visão seja incorporada no plano.

    Com 6.2 milhões de moradores, Rio precisa desenvolver seu próprio Plano Diretor e seu plano de transporte integrado. O Plano Diretor da cidade foi desenvolvido pela Secretaria Municipal de Urbanismo e foi aprovado pelo Prefeito em 2011. O processo de consulta precisou mais de um ano para ser completado devido à ativa participação da sociedade civil no processo de formulação. Para desenvolver o plano aquela Secretaria precisou estabelecer claramente o desenvolvimento que Rio procura para os próximos 10 anos. A preparação também precisou de bons diagnósticos da cidade e suas condições urbanas, com detalhamento das áreas em risco ambiental e com alta vulnerabilidade.

    O Plano Diretor do Rio tem um bom detalhamento do instrumento de zoneamento. Aquele instrumento predefine o uso (ou usos) do solo numa área especifica. Por exemplo, devido ao zoneamento uma área definida como residencial não pode se tornar numa área de desenvolvimento industrial porque já está previamente definido seu uso. É importante destacar que dentro do zoneamento, os bairros de baixa renda e favelas são declarados “áreas de interesse social”, as quais permitem o desenvolvimento de programas de urbanização, além da promoção de serviços públicos subsidiados naquelas zonas.

    Embora o Plano Diretor seja um instrumento muito importante e de valor para os encarregados do planejamento da cidade, o instrumento também tem suas limitações. Por exemplo, atualmente com todos os preparativos para a Copa e Olimpíadas, a cidade tem apresentado dificuldade para viabilizar projetos que não estejam bem definidos no Plano Diretor, criando improvisações por parte do governo local e conflito com os residentes da cidade, especialmente nos casos de reassentamento e outras medidas complexas que afetam a população mais vulnerável.

    Foto: Secretaria Municipal de Urbanismo do Rio de Janeiro

    Catalina Gomez, Rio de Janeiro Community Manager

    Planning the medium and long-term development of a city is not an easy task — it requires a clear framework and effective tools. In order to understand how planning takes place in Rio de Janeiro, it is important to look at the highlights of the Brazilian planning framework, and then how it is implemented at the city level.

    Urban planning throughout Brazilian cities is a municipal responsibility. It is guided by the Estatuto das Cidades, the law that guides urban development and planning in Brazil. The Estatuto was approved in 2001 and requires that cities with more than 20 thousand residents develop a Master Plan, and use it as the main instrument to guide urban development (the plan must be updated every 10 years). In addition, the Estatuto requires that cities of more than 500 thousand residents develop an integrated urban transportation plan that is compatible with what is stated in the Master Plan.

    Most cities do comply with this requirement of the Master Plan, but challenges remain, including how to ensure better quality of planning instruments, especially in municipalities with less institutional capacities. Another challenge that many cities face is ensuring an adequate consultation process with city residents, so that their views are reflected in the plan.

    As a city of more than 6,2 million, Rio is required to develop a Master Plan, and the related integrated urban transportation plan. The Master Plan was developed by the city’s Urban Development Secretariat and was approved by the Mayor in 2011. The consultation process took over a year, as various civil society groups actively participated on its formulation. In order to develop this plan, the Secretariat had to define the city’s long-term vision and provide detail on the type of development the city intends to pursue over the next 10 years. In addition, the Secretariat developed a detailed diagnostic of the city’s urban conditions, with a specific focus on vulnerable and environmentally-degraded areas.

    Rio’s Master Plan also has a detailed description of its “zoning” instrument, which is used to predefine the uses of a specific piece of land. For example, a residential neighborhood cannot turn into an industrial area because its use has already been pre-established. Low-income neighborhoods are declared “areas of social interest,” allowing them to be targeted by urban upgrading programs and subsidized public services.

    Although the Master Plan is a highly useful instrument and hold much value for city planners, it has limitations. For example, as the city gets ready to host the upcoming World Cup and Summer Olympic Games, many new developments that aren’t clearly defined in the Master Plan are leaving room for improvisation and therefore creating conflict. This is especially true when it comes to displacement and the implementation of other complex social and economic measures, effecting the most vulnerable.

    Photo credit: Secretaria Municipal de Urbanismo do Rio de Janeiro

    Widya Anggraini, Jakarta Community Manager

    In 2004, the Indonesian government passed a law saying that participatory public meetings must be used to involve the community in planning decisions. This bottom-up approach is called the Council Meeting Development Plan (Musrenbang), and is used from the village-level government all the way to the national level. However, this system faces challenges including low levels of participation, which leads to inefficency. Organizations like Seknas Fitra and Kemitraan are working on these issues to ensure that citizens’ opinions are heard and acted upon. Seknas Fitra works mostly on budget transparency and open information issues, while Kemitraan works with the National Member of Parliament to improve its representation capacity and to listen to their electoral districts’ voices.

    Perencanaan pembangunan yang ideal adalah perencanaan yang melibatkan masyarakat dalam prosesnya atau kerap kita kenal dengan sebutan perencanaan partisipatif. Bangsa Indonesia telah menggunakan prinsip tersebut dan melegalkan system perencanaan partisipatif dalam sebuah undang-undang yaitu Undang-undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional yang menyebutkan bahwa setiap proses perencanaan pembangunan dari tingkat desa/kelurahan hingga nasional harus melibatkan partisipasi sebanyak-banyaknya dari masyarakat dalam sebuah forum pertemuan yang disebut Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan (Musrenbang). Musrenbang merupakan ajang menjaring aspirasi masyarakat melalui pendekatan ‘bottom-up’. Meski demikian, hingga kini keluhan masyarakat tentang belum tertampungnya aspirasi mereka masih terdengar dimana-mana.

    Pemandangan gedung-gedung terbengkalai kerap merupakan akibat negatif pembangunan yang mengabaikan aspirasi masyarakat. Contohnya adalah kejadian yang terjadi di Jakarta Timur dimana masyarakat memprotes dan berusaha menghentikan proses pembangunan kios komersial yang diprakarsai oleh Pemerintah Daerah di dalam sebuah Taman Kota. Masyarakat berkeberatan dengan pembangunan tersebut karena dianggap merugikan dan dengan upaya warga akhirnya kegiatan pembangunan berhasil dihentikan. Sesuai sistem perencanaan kita, pada dasarnya Musrenbang merupakan wadah paling tepat dalam menyampaikan aspirasi. Pendekatan yang partisipatif memungkinkan warga hadir ke Musrenbang dan menyampaikan aspirasi secara langsung. Namun demikian seringkali prioritas kegiatan yang muncul sering hilang ataupun berganti saat dilaksanakan Musrenbang di tingkat yang lebih atas. Hal ini di percaya karena adanya intervensi politik dari beberapa pihak yang memaksakan agar programnya menjadi daftar prioritas untuk dibiayai oleh pemerintah. Intervensi dan tidak adanya keterbukaan informasi dan anggaran menyebabkan masyarakat seperti buta mengenai rencana pemerintah dalam melaksanakan pembangunan. Sekretariat Nasional Forum Indonesia Untuk Transparansi Anggaran (Seknas Fitra) merupakan salah satu garda depan dalam mendukung keterbukaan informasi anggaran melalui advokasinya menuntut agar masyarakat dilibatkan dalam proses perencanaan penganggaran dari proses penyusunan, pembahasan, pelaksanaan, hingga tahap evaluasinya. Dengan mengetahui anggaran daerah, masyarakat akan mampu mengetahui rencana pemerintah dan pada saat yang sama mereka juga akan menyampaikan aspirasi dan kebutuhan mereka sesuai kemampuan daerah.

    Secara konseptual, proses Musrenbang dimulai dari tingkat terendah yaitu desa hingga nasional, namun dalam praktiknya masih menyisakan banyak masalah. Proses penjaringan aspirasi masyarakat tidak selalu berjalan mulus dan tidak setiap kebutuhan masyarakat dapat terakomodasi dengan baik maupun dapat terealisasi dalam kegiatan pembangunan. Salah satu bentuk penjaringan aspirasi adalah melalui penyampaian usulan kepada anggota parlemen, terutama selama masa reses. Salah satu organisasi yang secara aktif memberikan dukungan kepada anggota DPR RI untuk menjaring aspirasi selama masa reses adalah Kemitraan melalui sebuah program yang disebut sebagai Jabat (Jangkau dan Libatkan). Tujuan utama dari program ini adalah untuk mendekatkan anggota parlemen kepada konstituennya dan menyerap sebanyak mungkin aspirasi untuk disalurkan melalui program-program anggota parlemen. Program Jabat mendapat sambutan baik dari anggota dewan yang ikut terlibat serta konstituen di dapil dewan sebab dengan agenda reses ini tercipta komunikasi dan ada mekanisme dimana masyarakat bisa berkomunikasi langsung dengan anggota dewan perwakilan mereka dan mengetahui sampai sejauh mana aspirasi yang mereka sampaikan telah ditindak-lanjuti.

    Selain itu, aspirasi dapat disampaikan masyarakat melalui rumah aspirasi yang dibentuk anggota dewan seperti halnya rumah aspirasi milik Budiman Sudjatmiko, anggota DPR RI dari fraksi PDI Perjuangan yang membuat Rumah Aspirasi Budiman di salah satu dapilnyaa, Banyumas, Jawa Tengah. Rumah aspirasi ini berfungsi sebagai wadah penyalur aspirasi dan tempat mengadu masyarakat terkait permasalahan yang terjadi di wilayah daerah pemilihan Budiman. Tidak jarang Budiman mengadakan dialog dengan masyarakat sekitar. Aktivitas Rumah Aspirasi Budiman sebagaian besar dibiayai oleh Budiman sendiri serta donasi yang sifatnya tidak mengikat.

    Foto 1: Pembangunan terbengkalai di Jakarta. Foto 2: Pembangunan terbengkalai di Jakarta. Foto 3: Rumah Aspirasi Budiman (RAB) di Banyumas.

    দ্বঢাকা সমিতি

    ঢাকা শহরের অধিকাংশ দরিদ্রগোষ্ঠী নদীর তীরে বসবাস করে, যেখানে বন্যা ও ভূমিধ্বসের সম্ভাবনা প্রচুর। জমির উচ্চ মূল্য এবং দূর্বল অর্থনৈতিক অবস্থার কারনে, শহরের অধিকাংশ দরিদ্র জনগোষ্ঠী নিষ্কাশন প্রণালীর কাছাকাছি অথবা সংকীর্ণ স্থানগুলিতেই শুধুমাত্র বসবাস করতে সমর্থ হয়। দ্রুত জলবায়ু পরিবর্তন, ভারী বৃষ্টিপাত এবং বৈশ্বিক উষ্ণায়নের কারণে এই এলাকাটি আরো বন্যা প্রবণ হয়েছে। তাই, এসব এলাকায় বসবাস তাদের দারিদ্র জীবনের উপর কঠিন প্রভাব ফেলে। তাই ঢাকা শহর পরিকল্পনা এবং উন্নয়ন সংস্থা, রাজউক (রাজধানী উন্নয়ন কর্তৃপক্ষ) “হাতির ঝিল” নামক একটি বড় প্রকল্পের পরিকল্পনা করেছে যা শহুরে দরিদ্রদের বাসস্থান সুবিধার পাশাপাশি ঢাকা শহরের পরিবেশগত স্থায়িত্বও নিশ্চিত করবে।

    রাজউক তাদের “হাতির ঝিল” প্রকল্পের কাঠামোর মধ্যে পরিবেশ ও সংযোগ সমস্যার সমাধান উল্লেখ করে। হাতির ঝিল খাল এলাকাটির পরিবেশগত অবনতির মাত্রা তীব্র হওার কারণে খালটি ‘মৃত খাল’ হিসেবে পরিচিতি লাভ করে, যেখানে শুধু কালো পানি প্রবাহিত হতো। সময়ের সাথে সাথে বর্জ্য ফেলবার কারণে হাতির ঝিল খাল একটি বর্জ্য জমি হয়ে ওঠে। পরিবেশগত অত্যাচারের পাশাপাশি, এই বর্জ্য-জমি ভূমিদস্যুদের শিকারে পরিণত হয় যারা খালের চারপাশে বৈধ ও অবৈধ বসতি স্থাপন করে। এই অসুস্থ পরিবেশ ও অপরিকল্পিত বসতি চর্চা হাতির ঝিল খাল এলাকায় অনেক উন্নয়নমূলক পদক্ষেপকে সমস্যাজনিত করে তুলে।

    ঢাকা ওয়াসার (পানি সরবরাহ এবং নিষ্কাশন কর্তৃপক্ষ) সহযোগিতায় রাজউক (রাজধানী উন্নয়ন কর্তৃপক্ষ) এবং বুয়েটের (বাংলাদেশ প্রকৌশল বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়) নগরী উন্নয়ন ও আঞ্চলিক পরিকল্পনা বিভাগ “বেগুন বাড়ি খাল সহ হাতিরঝিল এলাকার সুসংহত উন্নয়ন প্রকল্প” চালু করেছে, যারা হাতিরঝিল এলাকার পরিবেশ নতুন এবং সুন্দরভাবে গড়ে তোলার জন্য এবং ঢাকার অন্যান্য এলাকার সাথে এই এলাকার সংযোগ বাড়ানোর জন্য কাজ করে যাচ্ছে। কিন্তু এর পরিকল্পনা প্রক্রিয়া পর্যালোচনা করে দেখা যায় যে, প্রকল্পটিতে কর্তৃপক্ষের প্রভাব অনেক বেশী ছিল, ফলে খালের আশেপাশের এলাকার বিধিবদ্ধ এবং বিধিবহির্ভূত জনবসতির মানুষরা এই প্রকল্পটিকে সাহায্য করার ব্যাপারে উদাসীন হয়ে উঠছিল।

    এই প্রকল্পটি হাতির ঝিল এলাকাটিকে ঢাকা শহরের ধনী-গরীব উভয় বাসিন্দাদের জন্য একটি সুন্দর পরিবেশ-বান্ধব যায়গা হিসাবে তৈরি করেছে। যেহেতু হাতির ঝিল খালটিকে খুড়ে হ্রদে পরিণত করা হয়েছে, তাই এখন এটির নিচু অংশ বেশী পানি ধারন করার ক্ষমতা রাখে যা ঢাকা শহরে বন্যার ঝুকি কমিয়ে দেয়। তাই এখন ঢাকার দরিদ্র বাসিন্দারা যারা নর্দমার পাশে বসবাস করে, বন্যা দ্বারা তাদের কম ক্ষতি হয়ে থাকে। উপরন্তু, হাতির ঝিলের উপর নির্মিত সেতু এর আশেপাশের এলাকা যেমনঃ বাংলা মোটর, মগবাজার, মৌচাক, তেজগাঁও, গুলশান এবং ঢাকার অন্যান্য অংশের যোগাযোগ ব্যবস্থার উন্নতি করেছে। হাতির ঝিল বৃষ্টির পানি ধারণকরণ ছাড়াও, এর আশেপাশের এলাকায় রাজউক ২০০০টি এপার্টমেন্ট বিল্ডিং নির্মাণ করবে শহুরে দরিদ্রদের জন্য। এককথায়, এই প্রকল্পটির মাধ্যমে বৃষ্টির পানি ধারণ করা যাচ্ছে, ঢাকার পূর্ব ও পশ্চিম এলাকার যোগাযোগ বাবস্থার উন্নতি হচ্ছে, যানজট এর পরিমাণ কমে যাচ্ছে এবং হাতির ঝিল এলাকাটিতে একটি নিরাপদ এবং সুন্দর পরিবেশ নিশ্চিত করে গড়ে উঠছে।

    Photo credit: Ibrahim Husain

    AUW Writing Team, Dhaka Community Managers

    In Dhaka, the poor mostly live near river banks, where they face the constant risk of floods and landslides. Because of the high cost of land, the urban poor can only afford to live near drainage congestions or on the edges of deep narrow valleys, areas which are prone to flooding because of the heavy rainfall, exacerbated by rapid climate change in the last few decades. In response to these difficult living conditions, and some of Dhaka’s environmental and connectivity issues, the Capital Development Authority of the Government of Bangladesh, Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK) has planned a prodigious environmental sustainability project called Hatir Jheel.

    Previously, the Hatir Jheel canal area was severely environmentally degraded due to the large amount of waste dumped in the canal. In addition, formal and informal settlements had sprung up around the canal, adding to the environmental issues, and posing a significant challenge to any proposed intervention.

    RAJUK collaborated with Dhaka’s Water Supply and Sewerage Authority, and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology. Together, the team developed a plan to reconstruct and beautify the Hatir Jheel canal area, as well as to increase the connectivity of this neighborhood with the other areas of the city.

    The Hatir Jheel project was completed in early 2013, and successfully transformed the area into an environment-friendly and beautiful location for both rich and poor residents. The canal was dredged into lakes, meaning that low-lying areas can be used as rain water retention basins. This also minimizes the risk of flooding, causing less damage to the nearby residents who live on the edge of ravines. The bridges and surrounding roads constructed around the lake have improved connectivity to other areas in Dhaka, like Bangla Motor, Moghbazar, Mouchak, Tejgaon, and Gulshan. In addition, RAJUK has built new apartments for the displaced residents.

    Critics remark that the project was implemented in a top-down manner, without the participation of important stakeholders such as the inhabitants of the nearby formal and informal settlements, and the businesses that had developed near the canal. Despite these critiques, the project has generally been successful in facilitating rain water retention, developing east-west communication, reducing traffic congestion, and ensuring a safer environment for the Hatir Jheel area.

    Photo credit: Ibrahim Husain

    María Fernanda Carvallo, Mexico City Community Manager

    El Pueblo San Andrés Totoltepec en la Delegación Tlalpan ha sido parte de una metodología de planeación urbana instrumentada por la Organización Fomento Solidario de la Vivienda (FOSOVI). Dicha organización busca desarrollar el diseño y planteamiento del hábitat popular a través de metodologías participativas, y que incida en el diseño de las políticas públicas. El eje central de esta metodología es un proceso dinámico basado en la capacidad y voluntad de la sociedad para guiar su propio destino. Este proceso parte de la Investigación-Acción-Participativa; una herramienta que vincula la reflexión, el diálogo, la acción y el aprendizaje entre los actores involucradas y externos para promover el empoderamiento de las comunidades excluidas de los procesos socio-políticos.

    En este sentido, para FOSOVI la planeación urbana participativa es un proceso de toma de decisiones compartidas sobre un deseo, donde los fines son seleccionados democráticamente y puestos en práctica colectivamente; y que además serán soluciones sustentables en el tiempo para lograr mejores condiciones de vida de los grupos involucrados.

    Para su implementación, la organización se vincula con la comunidad a través de 4 fases. La primera entra en contacto para que la comunidad exponga sus principales problemáticas; posteriormente, en conjunto diseñan un programa a implementar que brindará alternativas de solución a la comunidad. Con este programa se analiza la viabilidad y estrategia de implementación identificando los actores involucrados y finalmente en la última etapa se ejecuta el programa con un seguimiento y evaluación.

    Bajo esta metodología, FOSOVI, el Gobierno del Distrito Federal a través de la Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda del Distrito Federal (SEDUVI), la Delegación de Tlalpan y alumnos de la Facultad de Arquitectura de la Universidad Autónoma Nacional instrumentaron talleres participativos para la elaboración del Programa Parcial de Desarrollo Urbano de San Andrés Totoltepec (PPDU).

    Para su implementación, se formó un Comité Técnico integrado por miembros de las diversas instituciones, consultores y representantes de entidades socio-económicas en el territorio, para direccionar el proceso de elaboración e instrumentación, la aprobación de los documentos y líneas de acción, la priorización de acciones y el establecimiento de sistemas de control y seguimiento. De tal forma, con la población interesada de San Andrés Totoltepec durante la primera fase se realizó un pre-diagnóstico a través de investigación de campo, mapeos y un diagnóstico participativo. En la segunda fase se construyeron objetivos, así como líneas de acción estratégicas para cada área de la Delegación, proyectos críticos y conciliación de opiniones en mesas de trabajo; lo anterior relacionado con los temas de usos actuales del suelo, medio ambiente, infraestructura urbana y estructura urbana. Durante la tercera fase se determinaron las prioridades específicas así como las metas y concreción de proyectos urbanos prioritarios; seguidos por la elaboración de proyectos y programas. En la última fase se llevó a cabo la aprobación del PPDU por el Comité, el establecimiento de los procedimientos para su ejecución y seguimiento al programa y la Consulta Pública. En este último punto, se presentó el programa a la población y vecinos de la demarcación para que fuera un proceso consensuado y democrático.

    Como resultado de esta metodología, se desarrolló un anteproyecto urbano para la rehabilitación de una parte del centro histórico del poblado; se promovió la rehabilitación de la zona patrimonial y se aprobaron estrategias para el PPDU. La Delegación y los actores involucrados integraron a la planeación urbana algunos de los elementos del PPDU, logrando un vínculo entre autoridades y la realidad de la comunidad. Como parte del aprendizaje, FOSOVI afirma que “es necesario que la administración pública reconozca un proceso de cambio que conjugue el procedimiento normativo tradicional y el ‘estratégico’ que promueve la más amplia y diversa participación, y que esté orientado a la acción”.

    Foto: FOSOVI

    María Fernanda Carvallo, Mexico City Community Manager

    The town of San Andrés Totoltepec, located in the administrative borough of Tlalpan, has been part of an urban planning methodology implemented by the Organización Fomento Solidario de la Vivienda — FOSOVI (the Social Fund for Housing). This organization uses participatory methodologies to design public policy; the core is to create a dynamic process based on the capacity of society to guide its own future. This is known as participatory action research, a tool that links reflection, dialogue and the knowledge of the actors involved in order to promote the empowerment of excluded communities in the process of public policy.

    For FOSOVI, participatory urban planning is a process, in which decisions are shared, outcomes are agreed upon democratically, and decisions are put into practice collectively. The goal is to create sustainable, timely solutions to achieve a better standard of living for the communities involved.

    During implementation, FOSOVI interacts with the community in four phases. In the first phase, the organization works with the community to expose the main issues. Next, FOSOVI and the community work together to design an implementation program that provides alternative solutions to the community. The strategy and viability of the solution are then analyzed so that the program is properly implemented for the identified stakeholders. In the last phase, the program is executed, as well as monitored and evaluated.

    Using this methodology, FOSOVI, the city government’s Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda del Distrito Federal (the Federal District’s Department of Housing and Urban Development), the administrative borough of Tlalpan, and alumni of the Architecture Faculty at the Universidad Autónoma Nacional implemented participatory workshops for the development of the Programa Parcial de Desarrollo Urbano de San Andrés Totoltepec – PPDU (Program of Partial Urban Development of San Andrés Totoltepec).

    For the implementation of this PPDU, a Technical Committee was created, with members of various institutions, consultants, and representatives from diverse socio-economic entities. The committee was responsible for the development and implementation process, the approval of documents and action items, the prioritization of actions, and the establishment of monitoring and control systems. For this project targeting the population of San Andrés Totoltepec, the diagnostic phase one consisted of field research, mapping, and participatory investigation. During phase two, objectives and strategic action plans were determined for every area of the borough. This entailed workshops to conciliate opinions, especially on issues like land use, the environment, urban infrastructure, and urban structure. During phase three, specific priorities and goals were determined, followed by the development of projects. In the last phase, the Technical Committee approved the PPDU and the establishment of procedures for implementing and monitoring the program, as well as the procedure for public consultation. Finally, the program was presented to the community and nearby neighbors to garner consensus.

    As a result of this methodology, an urban bill was drafted for the rehabilitation of part of the community’s historic downtown, using the strategies from the PPDU. By using strategies from this participatory action research method, the community and stakeholders were able to make the link between the authorities and the reality of the urban issues. As part of its results, FOSOVI says that “it is necessary that the public administration recognizes a change in the process that combines the traditional normative procedure and the ‘strategy’ that promotes a wider and more diverse participation, and that is also action oriented.”

    Photo: FOSOVI

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    Submitted by Gemma Todd — Fri, 03/28/2014 – 11:18

    Transport and infrastructure remain key components when designing urban space. Urban planners are required to evaluate transport routes, modes, and costs, to ensure the city functions efficiently. Across Tanzania key means of public transportation in, and around, the city includes boda-boda’s, or piki-piki’s, (motorcycles) and daladala’s (small buses). Such means are cheap, frequent, and although carrying capacity is limited, space can be made to squeeze another passenger on. However, with rising concerns over road safety, the costs of congestion, and the need for improved supply, the future of such transportation remains debatable. As the agenda shifts to designing ‘sustainable cities’, whereby urban environments can meet contemporary needs without jeopardizing that of future generations, we need to question what it means in the developing world. The concept of environmental justice is key. Discussions on environmental justice integrate calls for sustainability and recognition of the social, spatial, and economic, inequalities individuals face in relation to the environment . Environmental justice recognises the urban environment as political. Access, externalities, and use-value, of the environment are political. Read more.

    Submitted by Gemma Todd — Wed, 03/19/2014 – 13:04

    When discussing cities in Africa, and ‘African urbanism’, the focus quickly turns to the state of informality. Such raises the question of how developmental is informality? Who benefits from informality and for how long? Furthermore how can a system whereby the formal-informal are intertwined work? The issue has been a burning topic in Mwanza over the past week. Mwanza is a small city located on the southern coast of Lake Victoria, inhabited by around 635,730 people (Mwanza City Council, 2014). With development continuing, land markets remain a crucial asset. Over the past few weeks the focus has been on land – measuring plots of land, providing individuals with land titles, and bringing all dwellers under the formal land system. Nationally, the Tanzanian government claimed all citizens who do not have a land title should be granted it within 21 days of having their land assessed, measured, and the boundaries drawn. The proposed deadline suggests the end of an invisible population, putting people on the formal map and recognising formal dwellers. However, the achievement requires understanding how the system of informal-formal works. At a local level informal actors are key in determining the right to formality and future of urban planning. Read more.

    Submitted by Gemma Todd — Thu, 02/27/2014 – 12:24

    One of the key debates that have emerged within development studies is to whom does the responsibility lie? The structuralists among us focus on the ‘state’. It is defined as the state’s duty, and responsibility, to meet people’s needs. Alternatively, perspectives emerge identifying the state as an enabler – the key actors are civil society. The focus on grass-roots action has, however, raised considerable debate. Critics have argued firstly, civil-society is not necessarily positive. The broad category of ‘civil-society’ – whether communities, NGOs, or FBOs – rely on ‘social-capital, defined as the linkages amongst members of society. However, such capital assets by which people are argued to be able to rely, and draw, upon have been shown to have negative components and remain structured within a system of power inequalities. For example not all women joining a micro-finance programme are strategically empowered as the burden of time-poverty remains and not all can have their voice heard. Secondly, the social-capital resources are not indefinite but rather constrained and limited over time through a ‘poverty of resources’ (Gonzalez de la Rocha, 2001). Thirdly, should we be relying on social-capital to meet needs? However, traditionally, within many cultures in Africa, the community has played a major role in creating self-sufficient communities. Therefore do we need to revitalise the focus on social-capital? Read more.

    Submitted by Gemma Todd — Fri, 02/07/2014 – 10:42

    Data has emerged showcasing the latest trends of our demographic shift – the global population now articulates a ‘youth bulge’. The UN-Population Demographic Profile (2010) show children, and ‘youths’, comprise 1.6bn, and 1.0bn, of the population in less-developed regions. The population is younger; and Sub-Saharan Africa is no exception. Attention is now turning to youths: what young people do, what opportunities they initiate for their families and nations, and what it means to be ‘young’ in the developing world. However, an important caveat requires recognition: the focus has been particularly male-focused. Our understanding of girls, within both public and private spaces, remains limited. Such is the debate in this blog post – if we are now looking at ‘kids’ in the city and development, what are the experiences of girls? What can we learn about the city through an engendered perspective? Fundamentally, who is responsible to grant equal rights? Two models of intervention are discussed be, each using alternative methods to provide rights for girls. However, each acts to reinforce the need to improve our understandings on ‘being’ a girl. Read more.

    Submitted by Gemma Todd — Mon, 01/20/2014 – 10:08

  • URBim | for just and inclusive cities

    Mohamed Adel, Cairo Community Manager

    تشترك غالبية المجتمعات المهمشة أو العشوائية في صفات كثيرة مثل غياب غالبية الخدمات الأساسية، من مياه الشرب والكهرباء، والصرف الصحي. بالإضافة إلى انتشار القمامة ونقص الخدمات التعليمية ووقوع بعض المناطق تحت كابلات الضغط العالي والتعرض للأخطار العمرانية مثل انهيار المباني والإخلاء القسري.

    لطلما كانت هذه المجتمعات وأحوالها محل اهتمام العديد من المنظمات والمبادرات التي دأبت على دراسة المشاكل والتحديات القائمة حتى صرنا اليوم نرى حلولاً تهدف إلى جلب التنمية والرخاء لهذه المجتمعات.

    كل هذه المشاكل والتحديات التي ذُكرت سابقاً وغيرها ترصدها وتوثقها سلسلة “الحق في السكن” ضمن مبادرة “الحق في السكن، مجتمعات عمرانية عادلة ومستدامة” التي تهدف إلى الربط بين قضايا العمران ومشاكله بالحق في السكن مقترحةً وجوب احترام الحق في السكن في الدستور والقوانين حتى نملك حلول واقعية لغالبية هذه التحديات والمشاكل، مستبدلين السياسات والقوانين الضعيفة بأخرى جيدة وقوية تعكس رغبات واحتياجات الناس.

    أطلق المدون المصري والباحث في مجال العمران يحي شوكت عبر مدونته وزارة الإسكان الظل هذه المبادرة بالتعاون مع حركة ”مصُرين“ للصحافة الشعبية، و”مؤسسة التعبير الرقمى العربى (أضف)”

    تعد الحلقة الأولى من هذه السلسلة الوثائقية بعنوان “عشوائية؟ لا يا بيه دي مجهودات ذاتية” مقدمة ترصد وتسلط الضوء على بعض تجارب المجتمعات العشوائية في مصر لبناء وتنمية مجتمعاتهم معتمدين على المجهودات الذاتية متكيفين مع وضع غياب الحق في السكن وقيامهم بالدور الواجب على الحكومة.

    عزبة الهجانة، إحدى المجتمعات العشوائية الكبرى التي تم التصوير بها في تلك الحلقة، تقع عزبة الهجانة عند الكيلو 4.5 طريق مصر السويس، شرق مدينة نصر، شرق القاهرة، وتبلغ مساحتها حوالي 750 فدان (3.15 كم مربع)، تتفاوت تقديرات تعداد السكان بشكل كبير حيث قدرت مؤسسة الشهاب للتطوير والتنمية الشاملة تعدادها بأكثر من مليون نسمة، بينما تقدرها جمعية كاريتاس مصر بأكثر من نصف مليون نسمة، وتشيرا دراسات الحكومة إلى وجود أقل من 40 ألف نسمة.

    بالرغم من مكانها بين المناطق السكنية الغنية، كمدينة نصر ومصر الجديدة والمدن الجديدة، إلا أنها تشارك مأساة المجتمعات العشوائية. تتكون عزبة الهجانة من أربع مناطق، فقط تتمتع واحدة منها بالخدمات الأساسية بينما تقل الخدمات وتكاد تنعدم تماماً في باقي المناطق.

    تعمل العديد من منظمات المجتمع المدني والجمعيات الأهلية في المنطقة لمنح الأمل لأهالي عزبة الهجانة. في عام 2011 أسس الأخوان شريف وطارق حسني مؤسسة شادوف، الأسم مستوحى من الآلة المصرية القديمة التي كانت تستعمل لرفع الماء من منسوب منخفض إلى منسوب أعلى. تهدف شادوف إلى تحسين مستوى الفقراء ودفعهم فوق مستوى خط الفقر عن طريق منحهم الفرصة لزراعة الأسطح المنزلية أو ما يعرف بالحدائق الصُغرى التي تنتج محاصيل صحية ومستدامة. توفر شادوف للأهالي التدريب التقني والمعدات.

    تتراوح تكلفة المزرعة الواحدة بين 7,000 إلى 15,000 جنيه مصري تُقدم عبر قروض سهلة الدفع ويتم تسديده من خلال جزء صغير من مبيعات المحصول الشهري بينما يتم التدريب مجاناً. كما تعرض شادوف شراء المحصول من العائلات لحل مشكلة المبيعات والتسويق.

    في شهر مايو/ أيار الماضي بدعم من مؤسسة التعاون الألماني، والوزارة الاتحادية الألمانية للتعاون الاقتصادي والتنمية وبالتعاون مع مقر جمعية كاريتاس مصر في عزبة الهجانة، عقدت مؤسسة شادوف تدريب لزراعة الأسطح وذلك بتدريب 20 مشارك حول تقنيات وأساليب الزراعة المائية، تهدف شادوف إلى تدريب 180 مشارك بنهاية هذا العام حتى يمتلكوا مزارع أسطح خاصة بهم.

    يعد إحياء فكرة حدائق الأسطح لمبادرة مؤسسة شادوف إحدى البدائل لمواجهة ولو جزء من المشاكل والتحديات التي ترصدها وتوثقها سلسلة “الحق في السكن”، وتنجح المبادرة في تعزيز المجتمعات لتنمية وتحسين حياتهم للتمتع بحياة كريمة في ظل غياب العون من الدولة.